Steve Deuce: we’re not a nation of laws but of wills.
DEMS Set New Standard: If they can sue over this so-called ‘lie’ by Fox broadcasters then people can sue all day for innumerable DEFINITE lies from Russian Disinformation to you name it. CNN, MSNBC and the like are now set up for an onslaught of lawsuits based on this Dominion lawsuit.
Dominion- Dem Shakedown of FOX-GOP:
Just because the Dominion lawsuit Was settled doesn’t mean Dominion Voting machines weren’t corrupted during the 2020 election. As usual, The dems and dominion had the media and courts on their side so GOP-Fox was never able to fairly prove their side. Unlike in 2016 when the Dems and media were all over the Trump win calling the 2016 election ‘rigged and illegitimate .’ No doubt Soros, the Dems et al fully supported Dominion in this lawsuit. Why do Dems get away with it but not GOP? Call it Goliath vs David @dbongino for 21 min segment on Dems decrying Voting machines, and Time Mag : CNN admits to the ‘Secret History of a Shadow Campaign ‘ 2017?
Settlement is chump change for Fox and they’re not admitting guilt…just something the lawsuit-happy Dems think they can hang Trump on. Losers all the way around. Anyone who knows this stuff knows its a farce. GoP ratherbdonconatructive things rather than spend their lives in courts. And Dominion didn’t really want to go thru either, just a little nothing power play for them/Dems
How quickly and conveniently the Dems forget 2016 (and 2002 when they called Trump’s WIN ‘ illegitimate and rigged’ > https://mikeonline.com/montage-of-democrats-denying-2016-presidential-election-results/ And it’s not like c n n and m s n b c have never been sued and lost to, e.g., conservatives Rittenhouse and Sandman
DONT LET DEMS UNFAIRLY OVERPOWER FOX -Fox DID NOT Purposely Try to Defame Dominion voting systems. Dominion is backed by Dems and Dem media who are trying to turn ‘Fake news’ tables on Fox.
Hope Fox won’t ‘settle’ and thereby make Fox look no different than fake news mainstream media. We’re now in a position where anybody with enough money can sue somebody and try to put them out of business. Stand up Fox! Or this will be a big blow to FREE SPEECH and conservative media crafted by corrupt , big money Dem media backers. Those quoted Tucker Carlson texts were out of context at moments of frustration, admitted by Carlson or Trump would have never sat down again with Carlson.
This is definitely worth your time to read! You may agree or disagree. Your choice.
This editorial is right on the button. It tells how he got where he did and how the country is now suffering.
“When injustice becomes law, then resistance becomes duty.” Thomas Jefferson
Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is very brutal, timely though. As I’m sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation for being extremely liberal. So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvious socialist agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by our liberal media.
A WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ABOUT OBAMA
By Matt Patterson (columnist – Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job? Imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow
Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.
And what about his character?
Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
In short: our past president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.
And now Obama is back, with his hand up Biden’s ass moving his demented mouth…….. the USA is in real trouble…..
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.
And what about his character?
Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
Join an exclusive market research program! Share your opinion and internet usage activity to help brands create better products. https://afflat3e1.com/lnk.asp?o=21148&c=918277&a=145549&k=0D198C6BE009F60E6ED8B0450A3B217E&l=22084
I feel sorry for people who would rather spend hours watching a ‘show trial’ Where a one sided ‘star chamber’ would accuse Trump and his supporters for ‘killing’ a police officer (initials ‘BS’ which is exactly What this was), where a well-known habitual liar (whose initials ‘ AS’ could use another S ) is trotted out for a third time in five years to continue his longtime vendetta in lambasting Trump at any cost while purposely eliminating Trump’s words to protestors to go ‘PEACEFULLY and patriotically’, but worst of all, a complicit media that would cover another sham hearing in prime time with not a drop of evidence showing Trump orchestrated the January 6 riots (no mention that it was Trump who called in advance for National Guard to protect the capitol-an order that was ignored repeatedly by Pelosi And D.C. mayor Bowser). The same media would rather cover this McCarthy-istic programming than cover real news like the assassination attempt on New York congressman Lee Zeldan and imminent release from jail without bond of the accused attacker. (Such coverage might have suppressed coverage of ‘the hearing’)
I hope that if the GOP takes the house this Fall we might finally see a legitimate two-sided hearing(s) that the media can’t obfuscate. Otherwise, it’s same old devisive politics and media run amok like never before in my long lifetime.
I grew up in an era when media automatically covered both or all sides of news stories . In fact , I remember my journalism teacher getting after me if I didn’t interview people on both sides of stories . (I remember how this helped get me out of my shyness.) Walter Cronkite, despite being very liberal in his private life, was one of the last ‘fair and balanced’ journalists. When he left us news coverage began to spiral down to the same Russian-style news propaganda for which we used to criticize the communists in the 1950s
Following the Kennedy an MLK assassinations, their became a void in leadership with failing Presidents like Johnson and Nixon and the media , perpetuated by My own generation’ s new anti-establishment, liberal values, seemed to take over the power void as journalism became partisan politics- and now its been that way for over 50 years with no sign of change. My journalism teacher Mrs. MURPHY as well as Walter Cronkite- and even Tim Russert- must be spinning in their graves.
Where were we last night? At a much more enjoyable, a-politcal, timeless music concert, listening to the ageless Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons at the classic San Jose Civic Auditorium. The only mention of politics this night was Valli’s casual aside that he didn’t care much for government intrusion of any kind.
Maybe Victor David Hansen is correct in his recent assessment on the ‘death of wisdom.’ > https://roadtosuccess.us/victor-davis-hanson-joe-biden-and-the-destruction-of-wisdom/
There used to be an agreed-on body of wisdom, which both Left and Right, Republicans and Democrats, generally accepted. Heated arguments and invective centered on implementations and methods of solving problems, which at least both sides agreed were problems. Both ideologies accepted a common core of wisdom, despite their radical differences in interpreting it. https://thenewamericanist.com/victor-davis-hanson-joe-biden-and-the-destruction-of-wisdom/
Victor Davis Hanson: Joe Biden And The Destruction Of Wisdom
✪ The Biden regime is decoupled from both the past and reality, and quite capable of destroying Americans’ lives as they have known them…
There used to be an agreed-on body of wisdom, which both Left and Right, Republicans and Democrats, generally accepted. Heated arguments and invective centered on implementations and methods of solving problems, which at least both sides agreed were problems. Both ideologies accepted a common core of wisdom, despite their radical differences in interpreting it.
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and especially Biden’s strange cabinet of loud Jacobin amateurs, reject the very hallowed knowledge upon which civilization is based. In that sense the public has begun to recognize them as nihilist and anarchist. Nearly two out of three Americans in some polls hold unfavorable views of the Biden Administration. They fear that it is decoupled from both the past and reality, and quite capable of destroying their lives as they have known them.
Nuke Nuttiness
Since late August 1949, a consensus emerged that nuclear powers, for good or evil, were treated differently in matters of global tensions than non-nuclear powers, given the chance of a nuclear conflagration. Arcane rules, but rules, nonetheless, grew up in the Cold War between the Soviet Union, China, the United States, Britain, France and a few other nuclear states about the trip wires surrounding conventional conflicts.
The agreed upon wisdom from the Hungarian Revolution and Korean War to the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Middle East wars was to ensure such confrontations did not escalate to nuclear exchanges.
No longer. In the last five months, there has been more idle talk and threats about nuclear warfare than in the 73 years since the Soviet Union got the bomb. In a rational world, there would be two Western agendas amid the Ukraine war: first, how to aid the Ukrainians to resist Russian aggression without destroying their entire country; second, how to do so without either provoking or allowing Russia to use a nuclear weapon, or to encourage other powers like China to consider such alternatives.
Not now. In the zeal to protect the Ukrainians from Russian aggression, Joe Biden has talked about removing Russian President Vladimir Putin from office, without details about how or when such an intervention would work. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has boasted on television of his own experiences in planning successful coup d’états, once a taboo subject. Pentagon officials have leaked in braggadocious ways the use of American intelligence that has aided Ukrainian assassination teams to kill high-ranking Russian generals.
Bureaucrats, media strategists, and congressional leaders have openly boasted about selling Ukraine the necessary weaponry to bring the war home to nuclear Russia, whether that would entail raids inside Russia to destroy energy and logistical depots or sinking the Russian Black Sea Fleet through American-made, long-range shore-to-ship missiles. In response, Russian leaders, including Putin himself, have talked in Strangelovian terms about using nuclear weapons, in efforts to portray their aggression as victimhood worthy of a stronger, and apparently nuclear retaliation.
The ancient idea that in the nuclear age you cannot always do what is desirable to bad nuclear powers is considered passé and apparently deemed in need of a 2022 update.
Blowing Up The Border
Civilization used to accept that all nations in the modern era had borders, within which unique customs, traditions, language, history and culture were nourished to promote a common civic identity.
No more. Sometime in 2021, the Biden Administration blew up the entire hallowed concept of a border. It allowed what will soon be 3 million illegal aliens during a pandemic to enter unaudited, untested, unvaccinated, without English, without any background checks and without consequences for violating federal immigration law. Biden ignores that millions of doses of toxic drugs are pouring across his nonexistent border, along with sex traffickers and cartel drug lords enriched by scalping transit fees.
The president never states how the nation will pay for a massive influx of dependents, much less how small communities near the border will have adequate social services for their own taxpayers under such massive pressures. As a rule, those destroying the border live far from the border. And they brand as racist any who object to the policies from whose deleterious consequences, they are exempt.
Why did Biden erase the southern U.S. border? Did a waning Democrat Party want new dependent constituents? Were corporate and business interests demanding new cheaper workers? Did the identity politics movement seek to replenish their assimilating ranks? Were unhinged globalists eager to reify their nihilist ideas of destroying all borders to establish a Davos-like ecumenical world overseen by transnational guardians such as themselves?
Who knows and who cares? The damage is the same, regardless of the motivations of the nihilists.
Modern Monetary Madness
Ancient wisdom also held that too much circulating money chasing too few goods resulted in an inflated currency. Hyperinflation ensured radical damage to a nation’s very lifestyle, as it descended into a Hobbesian war of all hiking prices and wages against all forced to pay them.
So what? Biden took a recovering economy, one fueled by massive deficit spending by three prior presidents, pent-up consumer demand coming after a nearly two-year lockdown, a labor force crippled by government-subsidized nonparticipation, COVID fears, and long-COVID disabilities—and printed new trillions of funny-money dollars.
Biden would have printed even more trillions had not Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) saved for a spell his own party from its nihilist madness. The creepy modern monetary theory behind such lunacy held that either money was a construct and the more of it printed the more people could spend it with retained value, or that any ensuing inflation would aid those without money and hurt those who had (ill-gotten) money.
So it went, and now American currency is being devalued at an annual rate of 9.1 percent. Retirement accounts have seen 20-40 percent losses, and years of annual contributions have gone up in smoke. The huge national debt cannot be serviced at the interest rates necessary to curb inflation without huge sums cut from entitlements or key elements of the budget.
The current self-created mess was foreseen and warned about by both Democrats and Republicans and ignored as racist, or elitist, or irrelevant by the Left. In other words, Biden’s lunatic economic advisors believed they were either exempt from ancient realities or that their careers hinged on insisting they were so exempt.
The Green New Debacle
Over the last 20 years, a consensus began to arise surrounding fossil fuel energy. While it was no longer so toxic, given radical improvements in emission reductions, the heat itself of nearly clean-burning fossil fuels might be contributing to “global warming.”
Therefore, gradually new technologies would for decades augment fossil fuels, then slowly they would supplant them. Finally new energies would replace coal, oil, and natural gas with renewable or other non-heat-producing energies—all at an affordable cost for the middle class and with plenty of warning and time to make the necessary adjustments.
Joe Biden simply blew up that paradigm. For a year during the campaign, in his half-educated shouts, he foolishly lectured the country that he would end all fossil fuel use, cancel pipelines, and put vast swaths of rich energy fields off limits.
Biden did just that the moment he entered office, as well as lecturing lending agencies and financial groups not to loan to the pipeline builders, frackers, and the horizontal drillers. In truth, they were a heroic bunch who had made America energy independent, free from any need of an optional war in the energy-rich Middle East, much stronger vis-à-vis its two rivals Russia and China, and empowered by affordable transportation and industrial power.
Critical Legal Lunacy
Since ancient times, laws were seen as a response to human nature, often modulated by religion and government, sometimes imperfectly in the case of autocrats, theocrats, and dreamy utopians. Nonetheless, civilization accepted that stealing anything, assaulting anyone without cause, or destroying the property of others were crimes by nature. Punishment prevented their recurrence, since their repetition would lead to mass disobedience and ultimately the unwinding of civilization.
Critical Legal Theory subverts those ancestral wisdoms. It is embraced by many in the Biden Administration, who ignored massive riots, arson, and looting in summer 2020. States such as California defined theft as a mere unpunishable mistake.
Prisons were emptied. Most lawbreakers were not arrested. Most arrested were not indicted. Few among the indicted were convicted. Most of the convicted were not punished. The result is an epidemic of murder, assault, rape, theft, and chaos in our major cities, a return to the chaos of the 1970s as the streets after dusk are ceded to criminals who mock those who appease and empower their criminality.
Critical Race Theory, another campus parlor pastime of the academically incompetent and unproductive, posits that racism defines America. It can be cured only by endless and enduring reverse racism.
Ancient truths in the process were entirely ignored, namely that humans are tribal and like fish or birds can naturally flock together by tribal, religious, ethnic, or racial affinities.
Only a nation state can supersede such innate characteristics by infusing a common civic identity that makes superficial appearance or creed incidental rather than essential to a citizen. Biden too has blown up that concept entirely by promoting identity politics and tribalism.
The result is a growing fear that once the government encourages tribalism, then all must revert to the protection of their own tribe—or perish.
Diversity—a euphemism for disunity—is our creed. We have taken all the abuses of the pre-Civil Rights era in the South—racial obsessions, one-drop fixations, segregated spaces and ceremonies, hiring and admissions by race, ignoring merit in favor of race, and racial demonization—and rebranded them as critical race theory. Apparently, the Bidenites believe in the folly that 2022 reverse-racist man is inherently smarter and knows better than his racist predecessors—and thus can be a good racist rather than just a racist, which always means a bad racist.
Transgendered Fantasies
For centuries civilization agreed that there were two sexes. Scientists and doctors since antiquity, of course, accepted that in very rare cases, some men and women seemed dysphoric. To differing degrees, a tiny minority cross-dressed to mimic the nature of the opposite sex or more seriously felt trapped in their own bodies. Vocabulary from transsexualism to transvestism roughly identified a range of these rare disconnects.
But no one believed that these maladies were common, or that one born with the primary and secondary sexual characteristics of one gender was in fact by his or her volition able to fully become the opposite gender, or to construct a third, entirely separate gender identity.
Not now. The country is torn apart by the insistence that there can no longer be just male or female restrooms, that biological males can rebrand themselves to their true nature as females and dominate women’s sports, and teens and even pre-teens can be given extremely dangerous and often carcinogenic drugs, as well as radical life-threatening surgeries, without their parents’ consent, and without firm medical knowledge of the eventual psychological and physical harmful aftermaths of such still experimental regimens.
The Biden Administration has insisted that gender dysphoria is a national epidemic, that there are three sexes, and that males and females must concede that sexuality is a construct—and to the degree everyone in society must radically change their lives from learning new pronouns to expecting young athletes with male genitalia to undress in female locker rooms with their daughters.
Each time Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Merrick Garland, Antony Blinken, Deb Haaland, Janet Yellen, Lloyd Austin, Pete Buttigieg, Alejandro Mayorkas, or Jennifer Granholm speaks to the public, the people concludes two things: these people are either crazy, incompetent, or ignorant of ancient human nature, and they were appointed to their positions for reasons that have nothing to do with either experience or competence.
And the result is the rapid destruction of most wisdom as we once knew it. ✪
REVIEW: The REAL Watergate Story by John O’CONNOR, Deep Throat’s Lawyer
Much like scenarios today where the media covers up the real story to protect (usually Dem operatives), so was the case with Watergate, according to O’Connor.
Nixon was way ahead in the polls- by 20% over McGovern in the run up to the 1972 electjon- so why would the Nixon people bother to get their hands dirty?
It was basically a setup by the Dems to entrap the GOP, continues O’Connor.
It begins with the GOP trying to get some files on Dan Ellsberg’s Pentagon papers that incriminate the GOP and Nixon white house. And it escalates when ‘traitor’ John Dean leads on an aggressive Paul Ehrlichman who wants to get evidence on Larry Obrien and a call girl ring politicos were using. Dean is fearful he and others (mainly Dems) might get caught and tries to get out ahead of Ehrlichman. EHRLICHMAN , who would have had the Dems on the ropes, instead goes much too far by leading the Watergate breakin, spurrednon by Dean. Watergate would have never happened without a rogue guy like Ehrlichman and Dean, Dems and media leading the GOP to their demise, much like today with the Dems and complicit media are trying to bring down Trump with ‘dirty tricks.’
By the way, Nixon won the ’72 election in a huge landslide over McGovern. What never got into the Washington Post was a wider CIA operation to ‘get Nixon’ with wire taps . The Dems admitted to the call girls but nothing more.
The GOP ,as is the case today, got scared, and tried hard to cover their ass. Watergate was the beqinning of the big media move to the left, says O’Connor. The GOP couldn’t get past the media’s lies and biased coverage of Watergate and ended up resigning.
G Gordon Liddy could have prevented the whole thimg if he hadn’t kept silent to be patriotic and instead fingered John Dean and the call girl ring, says O’Connor.
The bad guys who KNEW-the Post, John Dean and Dem
Postgatebook.com> mysteries of Watergate. To write this book O’Connor spent two decades deciphering Woodward and Bernstein ‘hatchet job,’ ‘All the Presidents Men’ and its flaws And more- and was the one who figured out who was Deep Throat (Mark Felts)
Great read will shed real light on our current dirty games and politics. You’ll see an amazing parallel in politics then (the dawn of a subversive media and intolerant Dem party) and now. Because the media has been covering for the Dems for 50 years , ever since then, the Dems are not fearful to continue to engage in their bigger dirty tricks and modern McCarthyism.
The main difference between the Republican party and the Democratic party.
Every Democrat presidential nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate – Biden (no surprise) was at the bottom of his class). Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Barack Obama was a lawyer. Michelle Obama was a lawyer. Hillary Clinton was a lawyer. Bill Clinton was a lawyer. John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer. Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress: Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer is a lawyer. Former Senator Harry Reid was a lawyer.
The Republican Party is different. President Trump is a businessman. President Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen. Vice President Cheney was a businessman. President Eisenhower was a 5 star General.
The leaders of the Republican Revolution: Newt Gingrich was a history professor. Tom Delay was an exterminator. Dick Armey was an economist. Ex-House Minority Leader John Boehner was a plastics manufacturer. The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon. Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers. This is very interesting. I had never thought about it this way before.
The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush, and Cheney, or who heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich. The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America. And, so, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, we have seen the procession of official enemies grow. Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation. This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers.
Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, which, in this case should be the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.
Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation. When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.
Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast, and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom, he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big. When House Democrats sue America to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.
Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.
The United States has 5% of the world’s population and 66% of the world’s lawyers! Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party. When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.
Taken individually these reasons may not be enough but cumulatively they are more than enough proof, and there are more left out such as the media’s complicity and social media, such as Zuckerberg’s $400 million contribution to left advertising to beat Trump. Then you have the ‘2,000 mules’ who were purportedly paid for stuffing ballot boxes with Biden votes in the wee hours of election night. Even if you don’t accept some of these there are too many others to deny Trump the election. Many, such as Attorney General ‘Bushie’ Bill Barr, simply ‘blew off’ these without looking at them for political expediency. Then, Big city left wcorruption. Threw out the dozens of GOP election lawsuits from overpowered swing state legislators, who never had a fair chance to investigate the election corruption. We may have to wait until November when GOP should regain house and Senate to do a REAL investigation of 2020 election – never too late to account for something as important as this.
Grassfire’s “Top 11 Reasons Why President Trump Won The 2020 Election And Joe Biden Lost”:
Biden reportedly received 81 million votes. That’s a questionable total, considering it’s far more than the historic candidacies of Barack Obama, who received a then-record 69 million votes in 2008, and Hillary Clinton, who received 66 million votes in 2016.
According to The Spectator: “Biden leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin because of an apparent avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee. Biden’s ‘winning’ margin was derived almost entirely from such voters in these cities, as coincidentally his black vote spiked only in exactly the locations [battleground states] necessary to secure victory.”
Biden won 524 counties (17%) — a record low — while Trump won 2,497. In 2008, Obama won 873 counties, 67% MORE than his former VP, and still received 11 million FEWER votes than Biden.
Biden was the first Democrat to win the presidency but lose the state of Ohio since 1960.
Lack of enthusiasm for Biden is evident on social media. He has less than one-fourth the Twitter followers (20.4 million) than the President (88.7 million).
Biden hardly left his basement during the campaign and attended rallies with only dozens of supporters, while the President spoke to tens of thousands of supporters who were undeterred by the threat of COVID.
Trump’s 74 million votes are the most for a sitting president in U.S. history and 11 million more than he received in 2016. It was the third biggest increase of any incumbent president EVER. Obama won re-election in 2012 with 3.5 million FEWER votes than 2008.
Trump increased his support from key minority groups. Blacks (men 18%; women 8%), Latinos (35%) and women (55%) all voted for the President in higher numbers in 2020 than they did in 2016.
Trump received 26% of the “non-white vote,” which is the highest for a Republican president candidate since 1960. Newsweek adds that he also doubled his support among LGBTQ voters from 2016 to 2020.
The Federalist reports: “First, no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election. Second, President Trump received 94 percent of the primary vote.”
Trump’s candidacy brought amazing “down ballot” success. Currently, House Republicans have gained about a dozen seats, and not a single GOP incumbent lost re-election.
If that is not enough, CLICK HERE and do a search on the word ELECTION or DOMINION or FRAUD to find additional articles. This can be done by holding down the CTRL key at the lower left of your keyboard and simultaneously pressing the “F” key. This will open a pop-up at the top of your screen that you can enter your search term in.
Lois says:The majority of American citizens knew it with the results of the election. It doesn’t matter how much you find out, there’s nothing that will be done about it. Our country is being totally destroyed by this administration and we can’t stop it.Loading…Reply
Archives Select Month June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020
- ORGANIZE YOUR EMAIL, get rid of spam, and EARN MONEY while you make life easier with the worlds’ largest (FREE) viral email program – check out: http://vib.cm/burtkauf
TOP ADVERTISING CHOICES - Internet - Email Marketing , Website Development, Text Marketing
In its 2010 study, we learned that Internet Marketing has replaced the old, traditional print (newspaper and phone book ) along with broadcast TV and radio , as the top ad media of choice by business and consumer alike - and more cost-effective (Ad-ology), with direct mail a close second. . Now , within the top-ranked INTERNET, Ad-ology has broken down the internet by category, showing email marketing still leads the way, along with website development (SEO) and mobile marketing coming on strong. Coupon Country and YellowPagesCoupons.net feature these top marketing platforms at unbelievably low rates 1-888-422-6876.
According to Ad-ology’s survey, the top places where small businesses will put their marketing dollars in 2011 are e-mail marketing (72.7 percent in 2011 vs. 56.6 percent in 2010) and company website development (70.5 percent in 2011 vs. 57.7 percent in 2010). CouponCountry does it all… or call 1-888-422-6876 GREAT GIFT IDEA!
Lois says:
M.L. Slape says:
