This is definitely worth your time to read! You may agree or disagree. Your choice.
This editorial is right on the button. It tells how he got where he did and how the country is now suffering.
“When injustice becomes law, then resistance becomes duty.” Thomas Jefferson
Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is very brutal, timely though. As I’m sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation for being extremely liberal. So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvious socialist agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by our liberal media.
A WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ABOUT OBAMA
By Matt Patterson (columnist – Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job? Imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow
Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.
And what about his character?
Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
In short: our past president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.
And now Obama is back, with his hand up Biden’s ass moving his demented mouth…….. the USA is in real trouble…..
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.
And what about his character?
Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
Join an exclusive market research program! Share your opinion and internet usage activity to help brands create better products. https://afflat3e1.com/lnk.asp?o=21148&c=918277&a=145549&k=0D198C6BE009F60E6ED8B0450A3B217E&l=22084
The three ‘fair and balanced’ Fox News moderators played a key part of the debates, not only taking up 31% of the debate time but asking penetrating questions while holding candidates’ feet to the fire. This is what true journalistic debates should be all about but rarely are these days. The sharp questioning gives more credibility to the debates and can even bring more influence and impact, either positive, if the candidates can handle the tough questioning, or ‘bad’ if they can’t. Tough questions like this are great, instead of the softball questioning we’ve mostly seen in recent years, but , hopefully, it will go both including the Democratic debates. #Fox, #GOPDebates, #Trump
LACK OF ‘DEMOCRAT’ QUESTIONS –
There was a noticable lack of questions about ISIS, the economy, Benghazi , the Clinton cash and other HIllary Clinton issues, since Clinton is the front runner on the Democratic side. There was plenty of back and forth criticizing Republican candidates but little about the Democratic side, this from a supposed right-leaning network.
We wonder if Democratic-leaning sponsor Facebook -notice the big ‘F’ on the screen throughout the program?- had anything to do with the tougher questioning. It certainly put the Republican candidates on the spot, but most seemed to handle the hardball questions with aplomb Hopefully, CNN and/or MSNBC and/or other supposed ‘independent’ networks will take a lesson from this when it comes to the Democratic debates and follow suit with tough questioning of Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, et al , if and when those debates ever take place.
Whether the tough questioning helped bring about a record TV viewership for debates of 24 million people is hard to say but, with that many viewers of both parties, the debates probably will have as much of an impact as anything in peoples’ decisions for whom to vote .
Despite the poll at top of page, we tend to go along with Pamela Geller’s opinion of winners Ted Cruz, Ben Carson , followed by Marco Rubio, with Carly Fiorina winning the first debate.
TRUMP BOMBAST OR TRULY DESERVING OF #1?
Despite what some would call ‘aggressive’ or even ‘mean-spirited,’ Donald Trump appeared to be the winner of the debates with people liking his outspoken, non-politically-correct approach. Whether his style will wear thin after a while should play out. Perhaps other candidates were wise not to try to attack Trump, who is good at attacking back; one of the few who did, Rand Paul, came off , perhaps, a little weak and may have lost some ground by doing so.
And , for those who felt hat moderators Chris Wallace, Megan Kelly and Brett Baer were too hard on the candidates , especially on Donald Trump it was Trump who , according to NEW YORK TIMES and other media, was given more time than any other candidate. Not just Trump but all candidates came under tough questioning, perhaps Trump slightly more due to his more controversial nature and issues.
We will see whether Trump can maintain his lead in the polls . Most other candidates didn’t hammer hard on Trump
Perhaps best line of the debates came from Fiorina in follow-up to Trump’s mention of getting a phone call from Bill Clinton
FIRST DEBATE SHOWS CARLY FIORINA WAY AHEAD
It’s surprising to us that Carly Fiorina wasn’t higher in the polling to make the second debate of the higher pollers. Fiorina has a very smooth, honest delivery and answers questions succinctly with a bit of humor. She can jab without being mean-spirited as she was perhaps the only one to take on Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, helping the Republican cause as well as herself. Polls had Fiorina the only condidate from first debate with double figures with over 80% of the votes
CRUZ and CARSON ALSO POPULAR
Perhaps least ‘politically correct’ is Ted Cruz, yet, like Trump, people seem to like his refreshing outspokenness, as he came in fifth in the ratings, just behind the calming Dr. Ben Carson, a 180 degree contrast to Trump.
Mainstream media seemed to make a big issue that Trump refused to close the door on a third party run if not selected by the Republican Party. Of course, it could be a big boon to the Democrats if that happened, ala Ross Perot in 2000 as Trump would likely take away a large block of votes from the Republican candidate. However, this would be very unlikely, as Trump could not win as a third party candidate- nobody ever has – and this is more fodder for the left unless Trump truly is a loose cannon as some would like to claim.
For now, Trump has invigorated the political debates and probably added more to the conversation noted by the record viewership.
MURDOCH CAVING INTO GOVERNMENT OVER HIS INDICTMENT?
If Facebook did have some influence, maybe of even greater influence goes to the top, and Fox owner Rupert Murdoch and his legal problems with democratic-leaning government. Beware .
IN NEW BOOK, PANETTA Opens Up on Benghazi , other topics …
Obama’s former Right Hand Man Breaks Silence , refutes Obama claim violence that killed four Americans wasn’t a terrorist attack on Benghazi.
Finally, a real smoking gun. Perhaps he was busy holed up / saving it for his new book and interviews he’s now doing but Panetta has come out in multiple interviews explaining how he told President Obama even before the ‘video excuse’ given for the Sept 11, 2012 Benghazi violence that killed four Americans that the REAL culprits of Benghazi were TERRORISTS. Obama flatly denied on the O’Reilly Factor that he heard this from Panetta.
Perhaps now Panetta will go before Trey Gowdy’s Benghazi Investigation Committee and put the ‘new’ information on the record.
So it appears, again, Obama went with politics over ‘transparency’ and doing what was right. And now, Gowdy has just come out saying that he has found new info on which he believes Obama could be charged of a high crime right now…. We shall see
The harrowing, true account from the brave men on the ground who fought back during the Battle of Benghazi.
13 HOURS presents, for the first time ever, the true account of the events of September 11, 2012, when terrorists attacked the US State Department Special Mission Compound and a nearby CIA station called the Annex in Benghazi, Libya. A team of six American security operators fought to repel the attackers and protect the Americans stationed there. Those men went beyond the call of duty, performing extraordinary acts of courage and heroism, to avert tragedy on a much larger scale. This is their personal account, never before told, of what happened during the thirteen hours of that now-infamous attack.
13 HOURS presents, for the first time ever, the true account of the events of September 11, 2012, when terrorists attacked the US State Department Special …
Available in: NOOK Book (eBook), Hardcover, Audiobook, Other Format. CAN AMERICA SURVIVE ANOTHER CIVIL WAR?According to Michael Savage, OUR …
CAN AMERICA SURVIVE ANOTHER CIVIL WAR?
According to Michael Savage, OUR NATION IS IN REAL TROUBLE and the seeds of a second conflagration have been sown.
Not between the states – but between true patriots who believe in our nation’s founding principles and those he believes are working every day to undermine them and change the very nature of the country.
Savage cut his teeth exposing the political left’s goals, tactics and actions as they attempt to tilt the country’s axis ever closer to socialism. In these pages he lays out his belief that lefties don’t want some to know… connecting the dots between their many frightening moves hiding in plain sight, and raising the not-so-obvious questions they don’t want people to ask:
-How are recent changes to the Senate’s filibuster rules a thinly- veiled extension of big government’s limits on our civil rights?
-Why have so many of our top military commanders been summarily pushed aside, after years of brave service?
-When will the nefarious strategy of “purposeful incompetence” underlying Obamacare be exposed for what it is?
-How is Obama’s feckless foreign policy not just weakening us in the world, but actually endangering our security at home as well?
STOP THE COMING CIVIL WAR is a no-holds-barred tale as gripping as any movie script in which some super hero or secret agent saves the day. Except no one but We the People can save the country we love. A page-turner from start to finish, this [intelligent and principled] fervent warning offers the Savage truth — a call to action in the voting booth – in order to defend the freedoms our Constitution so brilliantly established.
Read it and be ready to play your part in helping STOP THE COMING CIVIL WAR!
WAR in Iraq
Obama also said there would be ‘no boots on the ground,’ though it’s hard to call the 475 new troops being sent over for administrative purposes and to train Iragi forces NOT books on the ground. All told, with the new additions there should be roughly or exactly 1100 American
helping out the war effort in Iraq.
‘BROAD COALITION’
Without giving a number, The President said there would be a ‘broad coalition’ working with the US in Iraq. Upon further checking we learned of only nine countries agreeing to work with the U.S.
in the new depolyment. President Bush II entered Irag during his presidency with a full 37 countries on the U.S. coalition.
With any significant help from abroad, that leaves the weak Iraq army helping us, or us helping them. Look what happened last time we were in Iraq and , then, with a stronger Iraq army. Doesn’t look good…
NEW IPHONE 6 and All Sizes Smart Phone Covers Customized with this or other design:
It’s How You Say It’
Sometimes it’s as much or more important the way one phrases something than than the actual actions. Obama , in his speech, was sure to tell republican congress members
words , in effect, with regard to bomping the Isis:
‘I can do it myself but it would be good to get the support of Congress. Why not just tell his cronies that he would appreciat their support, rather than couch it with the opening back-handed compliment that he could ‘do it himself’?
‘Core Principles’– A rather strange mention by Obama was one of his ‘core principles’ having to do with countries or groups that attacked the United States would be attacked back, perhaps a core principle Obama just made up for the day… Look for a new book…
Aaron Klein – THE REAL BENGHAZI
New book from author living in Israel
NOTES ON OBAMA SPEECH – OBAMA DECLARES WAR IN IRAQ (without calling it war)
Healthcare is one of the top things a socialist leader first wants to employ because then, as leader, one ‘owns’ the country. One then has complete control over the lower income masses , in charge of what the masses most want, i.e. free or cheap healthcare. Obamcare was ALL politics. The truth was initially hidden in Obama lies such as ‘you can keep your doctor’ and ‘you can keep your insurance ‘ just to get the plan passed. Worry about the side effects later. Now, Obama becomes ‘hero’ to the low income masses and can get their votes and about anything else out of them as you are in complete control of their ever-important health …. until…
Once the ‘lowers’ finally realize their will be tax implications from the healthcare they may not be so happy, so you give them more benefits like more Food Stamps, disability, etc. – and THEN you bring in the Latin vote by opening the borders and beckoning the Latins from south of the border. The reason they didn’t do amnesty in the first term of Obama is because they didn’t want to take the blame for this more difficult tactic of opening the borders; try to blame it on the Republicans. But, The first term Obama controlled Congress and couldn’t blame the republicans – and he would have never gotten away with healthcare had he tried to do amnesty first term. It was most important to establish with Obamacare .
Everything Obama does is political. Obama could care less about healthcare or amnesty. People think Obama really wants to push through amnesty; yes, but ONLY IF he can blame the Amazingly, many Republicans are ‘swallowing the koolaid’ thinking that if they don’t go along with amnesty they won’t get the Latino vote in the next Presidential election. Fact is that most hard-working Hispanic voters are opposed to amnesty, though with more and more illegals crossing the border and voting illegally this could swell the pro-Obama voting for the Democrats not only in the Presidential election but in the coming mid-term election. Meanwhile, Congress is on vacation for five weeks while illegals continue to cross the borders into the United States.
Obama even runs against his own policies. After pushing amnesty he acts as though he DOESN’T want it. He tries to blame the Republicans. If Obama really wanted Amnesty that bad he would have done it FIRST TERM, but he knew he would GET THE BLAME while controlling the entire congress. Obama and his chief compatriot, Attorney General Eric Holder , were children of the Sixties, regardless of their ages. They follow closely to the Alinsky plan and what many Democrat followers THINK they want, including as outlined above. But wait until things get worse….
MID-EAST CRISIS
Meanwhile, the U.S. tries to portray an ‘even’ hand in the Mid-east situation, where there’s nothing ‘even’ about it. It’s a clear fact, as discovered yesterday in Hamas writings, that Hamas has no interest in peace and has broken every truce to date. Israel has no choice but to show aggression enough to , hopefully, get Hamas to stop sending rockets into Israel, yet U.S. Administration abdicates, trying to show an even hand. It’s a sad day now when it comes to an Arab country, Egypt, having to arrange the latest truce between Israel and Hamas. (Thank goodness for Egypt.)
The fact of the matter is, as the Israel Arab notes in the picture, above, ‘In the Whole of the Middle East only 1.6 million Arabs have Complete Control and Freedom and All of Them Live in One Jewish State.’ Amazingly, Israel remains intact today, despite the bombings and ever-growing nuclear threats – that may now erase Israel from the map with the push of a button – from Arab neighbors like Hamas, ISIS and Iran. Former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, said recently that Israel will no longer exist in 10 years. It’s now to the point that new nuclear technology and lack of REAL American support could eventuate that reality a lot sooner.
- ORGANIZE YOUR EMAIL, get rid of spam, and EARN MONEY while you make life easier with the worlds’ largest (FREE) viral email program – check out: http://vib.cm/burtkauf
TOP ADVERTISING CHOICES - Internet - Email Marketing , Website Development, Text Marketing
In its 2010 study, we learned that Internet Marketing has replaced the old, traditional print (newspaper and phone book ) along with broadcast TV and radio , as the top ad media of choice by business and consumer alike - and more cost-effective (Ad-ology), with direct mail a close second. . Now , within the top-ranked INTERNET, Ad-ology has broken down the internet by category, showing email marketing still leads the way, along with website development (SEO) and mobile marketing coming on strong. Coupon Country and YellowPagesCoupons.net feature these top marketing platforms at unbelievably low rates 1-888-422-6876.
According to Ad-ology’s survey, the top places where small businesses will put their marketing dollars in 2011 are e-mail marketing (72.7 percent in 2011 vs. 56.6 percent in 2010) and company website development (70.5 percent in 2011 vs. 57.7 percent in 2010). CouponCountry does it all… or call 1-888-422-6876