John Madden, One of Few Who Were Both Tops in their Fields as well as their Humanity
One of a handful of almost ‘ heaven sent’ in our lifetime, the o t hers perhaps Robin WILLIAMS, Rush Limbaugh, Roy Orbison, Buddy Holly and Ronald Reagan and there may be a few more but not many who were not only tops in their field but in their humanity. Interestingly, most of the figures didn’t live out ‘ normal ‘ lives , either dying prematurely or in an unexpected manner.
Only their humanity was as pronounced as their talent and accomplishment
When Madden felt he had done everything on the field he ‘retired ‘early only to take up a new challenge, broadcasting, where he, again, excelled above his colleagues.
But what makes Madden special and almost ‘heaven sent’ is his humanity. There seemingly wasn’t a player who played for him who did nt love Madden
Ex-Raiders coach John Madden, NFL Hall of Famer and broadcasting legend, dies at 85
Edited from Matt Kawahara S.F Gate
John Madden, the gregarious Hall of Fame coach who led the Raiders to their first Super Bowl title and later became a defining TV analyst and football icon, died Tuesday. He was 85. âOn behalf of the entire NFL family, we extend our condolences to Virginia, Mike, Joe and their families,â Commissioner Roger Goodell wrote in a statement released by the NFL. âWe all know him as the Hall of Fame coach of the Oakland Raiders and broadcaster who worked for every major network, but more than anything, he was a devoted husband, father and grandfather.â
In a statement, the Raiders shared that, âThe Raiders Family is deeply saddened by the passing of the legendary John Madden. Few individuals meant as much to the growth and popularity of professional football as Coach Madden, whose impact on the game both on and off the field was immeasurable.â
Added Goodell in his statement: âNobody loved football more than Coach. He was football. He was an incredible sounding board to me and so many others. There will never be another John Madden, and we will forever be indebted to him for all he did to make football and the NFL what it is today.â According to the statement, memorial service details âwill be announced when available.â Hired by Davis as a linebackers coach in 1967, Madden helped the Raiders reach what would become known as Super Bowl II, where they lost to Vince Lombardiâs Green Bay Packers. After the 1968 season, John Rauch left Oakland for Buffalo, leaving a vacancy at head coach. Davis chose to make Madden the youngest head coach in the league â younger than some of his players. That dynamic, combined with Maddenâs passionate coaching style and how he treated players, endeared him to members of the Raidersâ roster. âIt was like playing for your big brother,â former quarterback Ken Stabler told The Chronicle in 2006. âI think his age helped a lot â that and the fact he had so much confidence in us. He let us be the people we wanted to be off the field, and he let us be the players we wanted to be on the field.â
Said former Raiders linebacker Phil Villapiano: âHe loved outrageousness and he appreciated it when you worked your ass off. It was the job you always wanted, because you just had to do the job. No BS. No politics. No backstabbing. Thatâs why I loved playing for him. He just let me play football.â Madden could bark at players and gesticulate and yell on the sidelines. But he also allowed his players latitude at a time when many successful coaches were more straightlaced. Maddenâs three rules, he later said, were simple: Be on time, pay attention, play hard when instructed. And his teams helped cultivate the Raidersâ image of swaggering toughness. âWhen you have a good team, as we did, a good coach gives the players a little freedom,â said the late Willie Brown, a former Raiders cornerback. âJohn liked for us to be in before curfew, but he also knew certain players would probably be out after curfew. He didnât want to know about it; heâd say, âJust donât tell me.ââ While some wondered about the dynamic between Madden and Davis, who was demanding of his coaches, Madden maintained afterward the two worked well together. âAnything that I ever wanted that had to do with football, he supported me,â Madden told NFL Films in 2017. âIt was a perfect situation, it was a perfect thing for me.â Maddenâs first Raiders team finished 12-1-1 but lost to the Chiefs in the AFL title game. It was the start of a frustrating trend: In Maddenâs first seven seasons, the Raiders reached the conference title game five times and lost. They also lost in the divisional round of the 1972 playoffs to the Pittsburgh Steelers on one of the most memorable plays in NFL history.
John Madden
1 of a handful of almost heaven sent’ in our lifetime, the o t hers perhaps Robin WILLIAMS, Rush Limbaugh, Roy Orbison, John Madden. Buddy Holly, Ronald Reagan and there may be a few more but not many who were not only tops in their field but in their humanity
Only t heir humanity was as pronounced as their talent and accomplishment
When Madden felt he had done everything on the field he ‘retired early to take up a new challenge, broadcasting, where he, again, excelled Above all others But what makes Madden special and almost ‘heaven sent’ is his humanity. There seemingly wasn’t a player who played for him who did nt love Madden
Ex-Raiders coach John Madden, NFL Hall of Famer and broadcasting legend, dies at 85
Matt Kawahara
John Madden, the gregarious Hall of Fame coach who led the Raiders to their first Super Bowl title and later became a defining TV analyst and football icon, died Tuesday. He was 85. âOn behalf of the entire NFL family, we extend our condolences to Virginia, Mike, Joe and their families,â Commissioner Roger Goodell wrote in a statement released by the NFL. âWe all know him as the Hall of Fame coach of the Oakland Raiders and broadcaster who worked for every major network, but more than anything, he was a devoted husband, father and grandfather.â
In a statement, the Raiders shared that, âThe Raiders Family is deeply saddened by the passing of the legendary John Madden. Few individuals meant as much to the growth and popularity of professional football as Coach Madden, whose impact on the game both on and off the field was immeasurable.â
Just 32 when he became the Raidersâ head coach, Madden, who quickly became known for his sideline outbursts and unruly hair, led his team to the playoffs eight times in 10 seasons and compiled a .759 winning percentage (103-32-7) that still ranks as the highest of any coach with at least 100 victories. Maddenâs knowledge of Xâs and Oâs and unpretentious enthusiasm later informed his transition to the broadcasting booth, where he won 16 Emmy awards and revolutionized the craft with his use of the telestrator and array of comic-book exclamations. Madden, whose family moved to Daly City from Minnesota when he was a child, was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 2006. Former Raiders owner Al Davis was the presenter at his induction. âHe loved the game. He loved his team. He loved the Raiders. He loved this league,â Davis said in his speech. âHe loved the AFL and the NFL, and especially his players.â ïżŒ
Added Goodell in his statement: âNobody loved football more than Coach. He was football. He was an incredible sounding board to me and so many others. There will never be another John Madden, and we will forever be indebted to him for all he did to make football and the NFL what it is today.â According to the statement, memorial service details âwill be announced when available.â Hired by Davis as a linebackers coach in 1967, Madden helped the Raiders reach what would become known as Super Bowl II, where they lost to Vince Lombardiâs Green Bay Packers. After the 1968 season, John Rauch left Oakland for Buffalo, leaving a vacancy at head coach. Davis chose to make Madden the youngest head coach in the league â younger than some of his players. That dynamic, combined with Maddenâs passionate coaching style and how he treated players, endeared him to members of the Raidersâ roster. âIt was like playing for your big brother,â former quarterback Ken Stabler told The Chronicle in 2006. âI think his age helped a lot â that and the fact he had so much confidence in us. He let us be the people we wanted to be off the field, and he let us be the players we wanted to be on the field.â
Said former Raiders linebacker Phil Villapiano: âHe loved outrageousness and he appreciated it when you worked your ass off. It was the job you always wanted, because you just had to do the job. No BS. No politics. No backstabbing. Thatâs why I loved playing for him. He just let me play football.â Madden could bark at players and gesticulate and yell on the sidelines. But he also allowed his players latitude at a time when many successful coaches were more straightlaced. Maddenâs three rules, he later said, were simple: Be on time, pay attention, play hard when instructed. And his teams helped cultivate the Raidersâ image of swaggering toughness. âWhen you have a good team, as we did, a good coach gives the players a little freedom,â said the late Willie Brown, a former Raiders cornerback. âJohn liked for us to be in before curfew, but he also knew certain players would probably be out after curfew. He didnât want to know about it; heâd say, âJust donât tell me.ââ While some wondered about the dynamic between Madden and Davis, who was demanding of his coaches, Madden maintained afterward the two worked well together. âAnything that I ever wanted that had to do with football, he supported me,â Madden told NFL Films in 2017. âIt was a perfect situation, it was a perfect thing for me.â Maddenâs first Raiders team finished 12-1-1 but lost to the Chiefs in the AFL title game. It was the start of a frustrating trend: In Maddenâs first seven seasons, the Raiders reached the conference title game five times and lost. They also lost in the divisional round of the 1972 playoffs to the Pittsburgh Steelers on one of the most memorable plays in NFL history.
Late in a game the Raiders led 7-6, Steelers quarterback Terry Bradshaw threw a pass intended for John Fuqua that was broken up by Jack Tatum and deflected to Franco Harris, who ran it in for the winning touchdown in what became known as the âImmaculate Reception.â During a 2002 broadcast, on the 30th anniversary of the play, Madden recalled: âThat was the night before Christmas Eve, and that was a big old lump of coal. And that big old lump of coal has been sitting down there for 30 years.â . When Madden secured his 100th win in 1978, he became the third-youngest coach to do so behind George Halas and Curly Lambeau. âThere are men who can speak to you on Sunday mornings and your pulse rises,â former Raider cornerback Lester Hayes said in 2006. âThatâs a very unique gift Coach Madden had ⊠He would speak about war, and it would sound so good I thought I was listening to the second coming of General George S. Patton. It was like that every week.â After the Raiders missed the playoffs in 1978, for only the second time in his tenure, Madden retired from coaching. As he later told NFL Films: âWe won every game that there is. Regular-season game, playoff game, championship game, Super Bowl game. All we could do was do it again. And that didnât excite me.â But he didnât stray far. Madden began his broadcasting career in 1979 with CBS and ultimately called games for all four major networks, becoming one of the sportâs most recognizable faces over the next three decades. In the booth Madden was incomparable, frantically illustrating plays with the telestrator and punctuating his descriptions with sounds like âboom,â âwhamâ and âdoink.â He worked with a few partners before CBS paired him with play-by-play man Pat Summerall. The two would call games together for 22 years, including eight Super Bowls, with Summerallâs low-key steadiness balancing Maddenâs energy. âHe was John Wayne and Walter Cronkite,â Madden told NFL Films. âHe could keep everything on an even keel. Iâd be wandering off and then Pat could summarize it, like, in three words. And Iâd think, âThatâs what I was trying to say.ââ ïżŒ John Madden talks about the 49ers many offensive weapons as he cruises around Pleasanton. John Madden, the former Oakland Raiders coach, and television personality talked about the 49ers and the upcoming playoff game at his offices in Pleasanton, Calif. Tuesday January 15, 2013. Brant Ward / The Chronicle Maddenâs quirks, though, only contributed to his persona. Afraid of flying, Madden drove between cities for broadcasts in a customized bus he named the âMadden Cruiser.â He selected players for his yearly âAll-Maddenâ team based on hard-nosed, gritty play as much as performance. His down-to-earth, sometimes rambling style belied a dedication to the craft. Al Michaels, who called games with Madden on âMonday Night Football,â told the New
Ponder these questions: As an AmericanJew, or, If you were a jew,
1. If a Nazi-like doctrine took over America, and you could knock on the door of someone who obeyed all government orders regarding masks, regardless of their rationality, or someone who questioned government authority and obeyed few or none of its mask orders â on whose door would you knock?
2. If you were given the choice between knocking on the door of an atheist professor or the door of an Evangelical pastor â on whose door would knock?
There is something about most Jews that few non-Jews know: We Jews often ask ourselves if a non-Jew in our lives would hide us in the event of a Nazi-like outbreak.
I donât know if young Jews think about this, but nearly all Jews who grew up in the decades following the Holocaust often wondered: Would this non-Jew hide me?
I have thought about this all my life because the question, âWho hid Jews?â is one of the most important questions anyone â Jew or non-Jew â needs to think about. That question is far more important than âWho didnât hide Jews?â because great goodness is rarer than great evil and even rarer than simple moral cowardice. Yet, a vast number of books have been written attempting to understand evil, while relatively few have been written attempting to explain good.
The reason for this is simple: Since the Enlightenment, i.e., since the decline of Judeo-Christian thought, most secular people have believed, and nearly all secular thought has been predicated on, the reality-denying idea that human nature is essentially good. As a result, scholars regard good as the norm and evil as the aberration. So, they study evil far more than good.
That is why the question, âWho rescued Jews?â should be of overwhelming importance to humanity as a whole. If people are interested in increasing good and in decreasing evil, what question could be more important?A lifetime of study of this question has led me to the following answers:
No. 1: Sam and Pearl Oliner, two professors of sociology at California State University at Humboldt, were the authors of one of the most highly regarded works on altruism, âThe Altruistic Personality.â The book was the product of the Olinersâ lifetime of study of non-Jewish rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust. They themselves had been hidden by non-Jews in Poland, and I had the privilege of interviewing them.
I asked Sam Oliner, âKnowing all you now know about who rescued Jews during the Holocaust, if you had to return as a Jew to Poland and you could knock on the door of only one person in the hope that they would rescue you, would you knock on the door of a Polish lawyer, a Polish doctor, a Polish artist or a Polish priest?â
Without hesitation, he responded, âPolish priest.â And his wife immediately added, âI would prefer a Polish nun.â
I should note that neither had a religious agenda, as both were secular Jews.
Of course, most Christians in Europe failed the moral test of the Holocaust, but so did nearly all secular intellectuals. And few Christians today deny this. But any honest person would still bet on a priest before a doctor, artist, lawyer or professor. It is one reason I believe that the decline of Judeo-Christian religions is a calamity: We will produce fewer people who will do great good.
No. 2: Another study of rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust offered four characteristics of rescuers. I read this book about 40 years ago and I do not remember the name of the book or three of the four characteristics. But I remember one of them because it struck me as an original insight and because it made so much sense. According to this study, individuals who were considered âeccentricâ prior to the war were disproportionately represented among those who hid Jews.
Now, why would that be? Why would people regarded as eccentric be more likely to risk torture and death to hide a member of a persecuted group they werenât part of?
The answer is obvious: Eccentrics are, by definition, people who march to the beat of their own drummer, who are nonconformists, and who donât seek social approval.
That should give us some major insights into who would save Jews â or any other group targeted for death (such as landowners in communist countries) â if our society were taken over by Nazis or communists.
If this theory about eccentrics is correct, it should give us pause.
When I observe Americans, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, and, for that matter, the citizens of most countries at this time, this observation about who would risk their lives to hide a Jew leaves me pessimistic with regard to how any of these groups would act under a Nazi or communist regime.
We have seen herdlike behavior and an unquestioning obedience to authority that few expected to witness in previously free countries such as the English-speaking ones. Worse, we have seen unquestioning obedience to irrational authority.
Wearing masks outdoors is irrational. Yet a vast number of Americans have, sheeplike, obeyed irrational government demands to wear them. Telling people who have had COVID-19 to take a vaccine against COVID-19, when natural antibodies are longer lasting and more effective, not to mention safer, than a vaccine is irrational. Telling people who have been vaccinated or had COVID-19 to wear masks is irrational. Prolonged lockdowns of healthy people are irrational.
Yet tens of millions of Americans are unquestioningly obeying irrational orders and castigating those resisting or even questioning them.
It was âeccentricâ Christian pastors who kept their churches open and an âeccentricâ Catholic priest who sued the state of California for denying him his constitutional right to minister to his flock â and who prevailed against the state. Except for these clergymen and a handful of eccentric restaurant owners, almost all other Americans obeyed the stateâs irrational orders.
That is frightening because people who obey irrational orders and despise those who do not are precisely the type of people who didnât hide Jews.
So, then, here are two questions for American Jews (or if you were Jewish) to ponder:
If a Nazi-like doctrine took over America, and you could knock on the door of someone who obeyed all government orders regarding masks, regardless of their rationality, or someone who questioned government authority and obeyed few or none of its mask orders â on whose door would you knock?
If you were given the choice between knocking on the door of an atheist professor or the door of an Evangelical pastor â on whose door would knock?
modified and reprinted with permission
Who Would Hide a Jew if Nazis Took Over America?
There is something about most Jews that few non-Jews know: We Jews often ask ourselves if a non-Jew in our lives would hide us in the event of a Nazi-like outbreak.
I donât know if young Jews think about this, but nearly all Jews who grew up in the decades following the Holocaust often wondered: Would this non-Jew hide me?
I have thought about this all my life because the question, âWho hid Jews?â is one of the most important questions anyone â Jew or non-Jew â needs to think about. That question is far more important than âWho didnât hide Jews?â because great goodness is rarer than great evil and even rarer than simple moral cowardice. Yet, a vast number of books have been written attempting to understand evil, while relatively few have been written attempting to explain good.
The reason for this is simple: Since the Enlightenment, i.e., since the decline of Judeo-Christian thought, most secular people have believed, and nearly all secular thought has been predicated on, the reality-denying idea that human nature is essentially good. As a result, scholars regard good as the norm and evil as the aberration. So, they study evil far more than good.
That is why the question, âWho rescued Jews?â should be of overwhelming importance to humanity as a whole. If people are interested in increasing good and in decreasing evil, what question could be more important?A lifetime of study of this question has led me to the following answers:
No. 1: Sam and Pearl Oliner, two professors of sociology at California State University at Humboldt, were the authors of one of the most highly regarded works on altruism, âThe Altruistic Personality.â The book was the product of the Olinersâ lifetime of study of non-Jewish rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust. They themselves had been hidden by non-Jews in Poland, and I had the privilege of interviewing them.
I asked Sam Oliner, âKnowing all you now know about who rescued Jews during the Holocaust, if you had to return as a Jew to Poland and you could knock on the door of only one person in the hope that they would rescue you, would you knock on the door of a Polish lawyer, a Polish doctor, a Polish artist or a Polish priest?â
Without hesitation, he responded, âPolish priest.â And his wife immediately added, âI would prefer a Polish nun.â
I should note that neither had a religious agenda, as both were secular Jews.
Of course, most Christians in Europe failed the moral test of the Holocaust, but so did nearly all secular intellectuals. And few Christians today deny this. But any honest person would still bet on a priest before a doctor, artist, lawyer or professor. It is one reason I believe that the decline of Judeo-Christian religions is a calamity: We will produce fewer people who will do great good.
No. 2: Another study of rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust offered four characteristics of rescuers. I read this book about 40 years ago and I do not remember the name of the book or three of the four characteristics. But I remember one of them because it struck me as an original insight and because it made so much sense. According to this study, individuals who were considered âeccentricâ prior to the war were disproportionately represented among those who hid Jews.
Now, why would that be? Why would people regarded as eccentric be more likely to risk torture and death to hide a member of a persecuted group they werenât part of?
The answer is obvious: Eccentrics are, by definition, people who march to the beat of their own drummer, who are nonconformists, and who donât seek social approval.
That should give us some major insights into who would save Jews â or any other group targeted for death (such as landowners in communist countries) â if our society were taken over by Nazis or communists.
If this theory about eccentrics is correct, it should give us pause.
When I observe Americans, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, and, for that matter, the citizens of most countries at this time, this observation about who would risk their lives to hide a Jew leaves me pessimistic with regard to how any of these groups would act under a Nazi or communist regime.
We have seen herdlike behavior and an unquestioning obedience to authority that few expected to witness in previously free countries such as the English-speaking ones. Worse, we have seen unquestioning obedience to irrational authority.
Wearing masks outdoors is irrational. Yet a vast number of Americans have, sheeplike, obeyed irrational government demands to wear them. Telling people who have had COVID-19 to take a vaccine against COVID-19, when natural antibodies are longer lasting and more effective, not to mention safer, than a vaccine is irrational. Telling people who have been vaccinated or had COVID-19 to wear masks is irrational. Prolonged lockdowns of healthy people are irrational.
Yet tens of millions of Americans are unquestioningly obeying irrational orders and castigating those resisting or even questioning them.
It was âeccentricâ Christian pastors who kept their churches open and an âeccentricâ Catholic priest who sued the state of California for denying him his constitutional right to minister to his flock â and who prevailed against the state. Except for these clergymen and a handful of eccentric restaurant owners, almost all other Americans obeyed the stateâs irrational orders.
That is frightening because people who obey irrational orders and despise those who do not are precisely the type of people who didnât hide Jews.
So, then, here are two questions for American Jews to ponder:
If a Nazi-like doctrine took over America, and you could knock on the door of someone who obeyed all government orders regarding masks, regardless of their rationality, or someone who questioned government authority and obeyed few or none of its mask orders â on whose door would you knock?
If you were given the choice between knocking on the door of an atheist professor and the door of an Evangelical pastor or a Catholic priest â on whose door would knock?
Subject: Fw: My Health Condition Update-New Covid Variant To: YOU
But first, DID YOU KNOW?...San Francisco is now paying criminals not to shoot people? Its true.. Go to SF., Make a living not shooting people. > https://www.ktvu.com/news/san-francisco-will-pay-people-to-not-shoot-at-others
Must Watch “Mark Levin: Can you hear the screams of the Afghans, America?”https://youtu.be/2b7Owc1m3GgL
I am sorry I have not been very responsive to your Emails lately. I
have been somewhat under the weather. My doctors have diagnosed me as
having an acute case of Post Islamic Stress Trauma with Apologetic
White House Fatigue, PIST-AWF.
PIST-AWF is a newly defined disease that has become widespread and
highly contagious. Doctors at the CDC released a statement disclosing
PIST-AWF as a new disease. It is expected that Dr. Fauci will hold a
press conference later today.
It has already infected over half of the United States and is
anticipated to continue to spread. The disease itself affects the
cells of a person’s entire body then goes dormant. The disease ravages
the body and leaves serious side effects including, embarrassment for
your country, depression, anxiety as to when it will come to an end
and wondering how much more damage can be done and how long it will take
to repair the damage once a new person takes over the presidency.
Symptoms include:
Severe pain of the scalp from pulling your own hair while viewing your
president pander to Taliban terrorists.
Uncontrollable heartburn at 8:00 PM during the CNN coverage lies.
Stomach cramps from swallowing the fact we elected Biden/Harris.
Vomiting from viewing terrorists murdering innocent people routinely
on the nightly news.
(Beyond THE CNN cameras There are innocent Afghans being beheaded and slaughtered as you read this. And what about the American 160 service dogs the US didn’t have space for and are likely already the victims of target practice by the animal-hating Taliban? )
Bleeding from the eyes. This is not Ebola. It is your eyes reacting to
accidentally flipping to a channel that shows Al Sharpton as a
so-called legitimate news show host.
Since the disease consumes the entire body, every infected person is
then identified as the disease itself.
If you have these symptoms and consider yourself PIST-AWF, please
notify your local election board and place your name on the list for a
cure. It is expected, and sincerely hoped, that the cure will be
available in November 2022.
GOD SAVE AMERICA!
“He, who will not reason, is a bigot; he who cannot, is a fool; and
he, who dares not, is a slave.”
— William Drummond, Scottish writer (1585 – 1649)
Scoreboard watching at The San Francisco Giants game Sept 1 in the same city where criminals are now being paid not to shoot people
Lose Dangerous Covid Extra Weight and more deals, tips and funnies >
https://trialsitenews.com/us-senate-hearing-explores-ivermectin-as-miracle-drug-for-covid-19-while-mainstream-media-outlets-ignore/My colleagues in Cali-Colombia-South America had an outbreak of Covid-19 and a group of geriatricians (one of my previous student/resident who is now a geriatrician), PhD in pharmacology/ Internist, and Infectious disease specialist design a protocol to treat 82 confirmed cases of Covid19 at a nursing home [total population 250] mean age 84 and were treated early with ivermectin, nitazoxanide …
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/06/20/ivermectin-the-forbidden-treatmentIvermectin has already been approved as a covid-19 treatment in more than 20 countries. They include Mexico where the mayor of Mexico City, Claudia Scheinbaum, recently said that the medicine had reduced hospitalisations by as much as 76%. As of last week, 135,000 of the city’s residents had been treated with the medicine.
https://cairnsnews.org/2021/05/17/doctor-lies-on-tv-about-ivermectin-treatment-for-covid-virus-in-indian-states/By TONY MOBILIFONITISMAINSTREAM media has kept the world largely unaware that two Indian states, Goa and Uttar Pradesh have adopted mass prescription of ivermectin to fight the surge in COVID-19 cases. The heavily populated Uttar Pradesh in the north of India is claiming a high success rate. Goa is just starting. The vaccine-pushing powers thatâŠ
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/05/29/ivermectin-the-drug-that-cracked-covid-and-treated-president-trump/Ivermectin is FDA approved â as an antiparasitic drug. It’s efficacy against COVID-19 was discovered by a research group in Australia last Spring. Using Ivermectinfor treating COVID-19 is called “unapproved use of an approved medication”, which makes it neither illegal nor unethical, it simply means the FDA hasn’t verified its efficacy yet against COVID-19, which seems pretty stupid …
https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/ivermectin-treat-covid-19-coronavirus-3535912/Ivermectin should only be used in patients for COVID-19 in a research setting, as part of a clinical trial.; An in vitro trial has shown ivermectin reduces the number of cell-associated viral RNA by 99.8 % in 24 hours. An in vitro study is when they study cells in a laboratory and not in a living organism.; Clinical trials have been conducted on people to test how well ivermectin works against …
https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/06/30/ivermectin-is-the-new-hydroxychloroquine-for-covid-19-take-2-flccc-conspiracies/On Monday, I posted a typically lengthy, detailed, and snarky article about how ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine.What I meant by that comparison is that, just as 12-15 months ago the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine was the repurposed drug touted as a “miracle cure” for COVID-19 that fizzled when tested with rigorous clinical trials, over the first half of 2021 the veterinary …
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/07/26/how-the-covid-scam-is-perpetrated/How the Covid Scam Is Perpetrated. Paul Craig Roberts. I have provided numerous documented detailed accounts demonstrating the lack of evidence supporting the official Covid narrative. The next time you hear Big Pharma’s propagandists say “believe the science,” ask them what science. When believers in the official narrative and Covid …More Results
Some of you may be wondering what Alabama Judge Roy Moore has been doing since he was removed from the bench for refusing to remove the Ten Commandments from his courtroom wall.
The following is a poem written by Judge Moore. Judge Moore was sued by the ACLU for displaying theTen Commandments in his courtroom foyer. He has been stripped of his judgeship and now they are trying to strip his right to practice law in Alabama ! The judge’s poem sums it up quite well.
America? the beautiful,or so you used to be.Land of the Pilgrims’ pride;I’m glad they’ll never see.Babies piled in dumpsters,Abortion on demand,Oh, sweet land of liberty;your house is on the sand.Our children wander aimlesslypoisoned by cocainechoosing to indulge their lusts,when God has said abstainFrom sea to shining sea,our Nation turns awayFrom the teaching of God’s loveand a need to always prayWe’ve kept God in ourtemples, how callous we have grown.When earth is but His footstool,and Heaven is His throne.We’ve voted in a governmentthat’s rotting at the core,Appointing Godless Judges;who throw reason out the door,Too soft to place a killerin a well deserved tomb,But brave enough to kill a babybefore he leaves the womb.You think that God’s notangry, that our land’s a moral slum?How much longer will He waitbefore His judgment comes?How are we to face our God,from Whom we cannot hide?What then is left for us to do,but stem this evil tide?If we who are His children,will humbly turn and pray;Seek His holy faceand mend our evil way:Then God will hear from Heaven;and forgive us of our sins,He’ll heal our sickly landand those who live within.But, America the Beautiful,If you don’t – then you will see,A sad but Holy Godwithdraw His hand from Thee..~~Judge Roy Moore~~
They’re really piling up- the lies that is, what with the latest ruling that Trump did NOT clear Lafayette Park near Capitol last year for a photo op with Bible. In fact, MICHAEL Goodwin has come up with enough for his ‘Top 10 Media Lies’ which should NOT continue to be ignored and unchallenged…
by Michael Goodwin, New York Post
Another one bites the dust. Another media lie, that is.
The latest lie to die is the false claim the feds cleared Lafayette Park of protesters last year so then-President Donald Trump could hold a photo op. The Interior Departmentâs inspector general says police planned to clear the park so a contractor could install a fence, a decision unrelated to Trumpâs walk to a nearby historic church burned in a riot.Â
If the debunking feels familiar, itâs not your imagination. Only the details differ from earlier cases where the media mob got it all wrong. Sadly, the truth usually emerges not because of the press, but despite it.
Take growing acceptance of the idea the COVID-19 pandemic started with a leak from a virology lab in Wuhan, China. The idea was always plausible, but the press and big tech declared it a âconspiracy theoryâ and snuffed it out of circulation. https://cfcdfbf335a759c51ac66847f4214b83.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html?n=0
But after China couldnât prove the virus jumped from bats to humans, the lab-leak theory gained credence. Suddenly, it became acceptable to share it on Facebook, which appointed itself guardian of all that is proper in American discourse.
The pattern is so pronounced that itâs easy to assemble your own list of Top Ten Media Lies. On mine, the recent cases involving Lafayette Park and the lab-leak theory are Nos. 8 and 9.
No. 1 is the oldest and biggest: Trump colluded with Russia to win in 2016 and might be a Russian agent. That scam involved crooked FBI agents and led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who took two years to conclude there was no evidence to back the charge.
Yet the probe had enormous impact, with the drumbeat of anonymous leaks hampering the Trump agenda and helping Democrats take the House in 2018. https://cfcdfbf335a759c51ac66847f4214b83.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html?n=0
Even before it was gone, other distortions appeared.
Remember Lie No. 2, the âMuslim banâ that wasnât? Or No. 3, the mantra that the 2017 tax cuts were only for the ârichâ despite studies showing 80 percent of the population benefitted?
How about the âkids in cagesâ firestorm, complete with gripping photographs of migrant children in metal containers?
That was Lie No. 4 and the hottest story going, with Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rushing to the border with photogenic outrage. They vanished when it was revealed the Obama-Biden administration built the cages and the heart-wrenching photos were from 2014.
Apologies, corrections and retractions came in bunches, right? You must be kidding. Big media and big tech are too big to admit error. https://cfcdfbf335a759c51ac66847f4214b83.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html?n=0
Even now, with historic surges of young people at the border, the press doesnât complain about Biden banning their cameras. Thatâs not journalism â itâs complicity.
Lie No. 5 was the Ukraine impeachment of Trump, a creative fiction based on a complaint from an anonymous member of the swamp who never testified. But others did to say the president, in trying to get information on Biden family corruption in Ukraine, was guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
What Trump actually did was threaten the scam Joe Biden and son Hunter created that involved selling the suggestion that Joeâs influence could be had by hiring Hunter.
Thatâs the sort of thing reporters are supposed to expose, not protect. https://cfcdfbf335a759c51ac66847f4214b83.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html?n=0
Not so long ago, I saw such conduct as an outgrowth of bias. Because much of the press is an echo chamber of the far left, my assumption was that slanted coverage resulted from political prejudice.
That is true in many cases, but too benign to fully explain our new era. Five years after the New York Times and others abandoned standards of fairness to become anti-Trump activists, press misconduct is repeatedly exposed as willful malpractice. In a word, lies.
Over and over again, they are the boy who cried wolf. Itâs getting so where itâs safer to assume what the media insists is absolutely true probably isnât.
Just as liberals have become illiberal, media have become more focused on suppressing the truth than revealing it.
Take Hunter Bidenâs laptop, which is No. 6 on my Top Ten, although it rivals Russia, Russia, Russia in importance. When The Post first showed how the contents revealed his shady foreign business deals and how his father helped him, it was not unreasonable for the Times, Washington Post and others to hold off until they could confirm the explosive information late in the campaign.
The role Rudy Giuliani played in getting the material to The Post, which the paper disclosed, created additional concern because Giuliani was Trumpâs lawyer.
So there were legitimate reasons for caution â up to a point. But the real motivation in avoiding the story soon became apparent.
The outlets that held their noses over the laptop had no trouble embracing the claim from Joe Bidenâs campaign that the e-mails on it were âRussian disinformation.â
In what felt like a coordinated move, big tech instantly blocked The Post and other users from sharing them.
The final proof that media caution had morphed into coverup came when Tony Bobulinski emerged. A former partner of Hunter and Jim Biden, Joeâs brother, in a joint venture with a Chinese energy conglomerate, Bobulinski authenticated the critical e-mails because he had received them as CEO of the venture.
He also solved a riddle by saying the âbig guyâ slated to get a secret 10 percent stake was Joe Biden. Bobulinski told me he met with him in early 2017 and said Joe knew everything about the plan to introduce American mayors and governors to Chinese officials so the Chinese could buy US infrastructure.
All this was public information because of The Post, Fox News and a few others, yet most media cast doubts on the revelations. They were especially loathe to report anything supporting Joe Bidenâs role, even though Bobulinski gave all his evidence to the FBI.
That cone of silence goes well beyond bias. That is Lie No. 7.
Finally, the 10th lie remains active, so the truth has not fully emerged.
The subject is ballot integrity, which the left demonizes as improper voter suppression. Joe Biden made the astonishing claim that demands for photo identification are the new Jim Crow.
Naturally, his claim was magnified by the media, with CNN creating a logo declaring âVoting Rights Under Attack.â Even the normally sober Pew Trusts said, âRepublican Wave of Voting Restrictions Swells.â
One count had 361 bills introduced in 47 states, and Wikipedia labels all of them attempts to restrict voting access. Craven corporate leaders piled on.
Never mind that polls show overwhelming support for voter ID laws, with a March survey finding 69 percent of black voters and 75 percent of all respondents favor such measures.
The finding provides hope and reminds us there are antidotes to a corrupt press: Facts, facts and more facts. Or, as the late economist Herb Stein put it, âIf something cannot go on forever, it will stop.â
(Or Maybe They Wanted To Keep Blacks Down So They Could Blame it On Whites)
The Black Dilema
Now hereâs one email you can only send to a select trusted fewâŠ.
The facts as purportedly presented by a liberal newspaper even though Baltimore Sun may now Deny publishing it. Nonetheless it’s a thoughtful if controversial article that asks long overlooked questions worth examining
The Black Dilemma (per The Baltimore Sun)
The English came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Scots came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Germans came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Irish came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Poles came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Hungarians came and they were poor and now they are rich The Cubans came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Viets came and they were poor and now they are rich. The Latins came, they were poor but they have worked hard, now they are rich. The Africans came and they were poor and now they continue to be poor. WHY? read the below.
“The Baltimore Sun” is definitely not known as a Conservative newspaper,
so this very well written assessment of the situation in USA comes as something of a surprise.. even if not published by Sun it deserves a viewing.
“The Black Dilemma” For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?
The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.
Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedmans Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball. Their new laws intruded into peoples lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable.
They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice-versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless hand wringing to close the achievement gap. To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to Celebrate Diversity! and Say No to Racism. Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.
Some thought that what W.E.B. DuBois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough.
For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.
Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.
Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.
But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue its a problem of culture, as if culture creates peoples behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame white privilege.
But since 1965, when the elites opened Americas doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India people who are not white, not rich, and not connected have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black youths are committing half the country’s violent crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.
The experiment has failed. Not because of white culture, or white privilege, or white racism. The fundamental problem is that American black culture has evolved into an un-fixable and crime ridden mess. They do not want to change their culture or society, and expect others to tolerate their violence and amoral behavior. They have become socially incompatible with other races by their own design, not because of the racism of others – but by their own hatred of non-blacks.
Our leaders don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity. The elites explain everything with racism, and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.”
Imagine an alternative universe in which an enlightened Israeli government did almost everything progressive America demanded of it.
An immediate cessation of hostilities in Gaza. An end to Israeli controls over the movement of goods into the territory. A halt to settlement construction in the West Bank. Renunciation of Israelâs sovereign claims in East Jerusalem. Fast-track negotiations for Palestinian statehood, with the goal of restoring the June 4, 1967, lines as an internationally recognized border.
Oslo would be placing phone calls to Jerusalem and Ramallah in October, to bestow the Nobel Peace Prize on the Israeli and Palestinian leaders. Arab states such as Saudi Arabia would establish formal diplomatic relations with Israel. The international community would agree on a multibillion-dollar aid package for the new state of Palestine.
But there would be flies in this ointment.
Damascus would refuse to recognize Israel until it agreed to return the Golan Heights, which even the most left-wing Israeli government would refuse to do, given Bashar al-Assadâs record of brutality and Iranâs extensive military presence in Syria.
Lebanon, dominated as it is by Hezbollah (an Iranian proxy), would also refuse to recognize Israel, using the pretext of the Shebaa Farms, a sliver of land that Beirut claims is occupied Lebanese territory, even though the U.N. says otherwise.
As for Gaza, the end of the so-called blockade (âso-calledâ because plenty of licit goods reach Gaza today through Israeli border crossings) would turn the steady trickle of military equipment into the strip, most of it from Iran, into a cascade. Hamas, which currently makes do with relatively unsophisticated rockets, would replenish its arsenal with more powerful guided munitions, able to reach any target in Israel
This would require Israel to change its military doctrine toward Hamas. Out would be the approach of periodically degrading the groupâs military capabilities through targeted strikes. In would be a strategy calling for a full-scale land invasion and reoccupation of the strip in order to defend the Israeli heartland from Hamasâs missiles. The casualty count in the next war would be multiples of what it is today.
In addition to its new military might, Hamas would be strengthened politically. Its policy of resistance â i.e., guerrilla warfare and terrorism â against Israel would look to many Palestinians as though it forced a change in Israeli policy, while the more peaceful policies of Mahmoud Abbasâs Fatah party would smack of fruitless collaboration.
The international community would try to help Fatah with lavish economic aid and technical assistance. But Fatah has a long record of corruption and mismanagement, two factors that helped Hamas win parliamentary elections in 2006. Since then, Abbasâs approach to his political opponents has been to suspend elections and persecute rivals like Muhammad Dahlan and Salam Fayyad.
But at 85, Abbas wonât be able to stave off elections forever. Eventually, Hamas will come to power, doubly legitimized by success at the polls and its commitment to wipe Israel off the map.
Before then, however, Israel would freeze all settlement construction with a view toward forcing settlers to leave their homes or be stranded inside a future Palestinian state.
The result would be massive radicalization among Israelis against their own government, dwarfing the unholy furies that led to Yitzhak Rabinâs assassination in 1995. Any decision to repartition Jerusalem in ways that risked or hampered access to the Western Wall and other sacred Jewish sites like the Mount of Olives (the entire Old City was in Jordanian hands before the Six-Day War) would likely spark civil war.
But perhaps the progressive Israeli government might yet succeed if a U.N.-sanctioned, U.S.-led force â you might almost call it a mandate â agreed to deploy peacekeeping forces to guarantee Jewish rights and security. Americaâs appetite for such deployments hasnât exactly been growing in recent years, and its staying power is easily tested. Some Israelis might wonder how long their ostensible benefactors would stay should a suicide bomber kill several hundred Marines in a Beirut-style barracks attack.
In the meantime, a Hamas administration in the West Bank wouldnât take long to duplicate the formula that paid such dividends for it in Gaza: the complete militarization of the territory, putting every Israeli at immediate risk of rocket attack.
In this it would be greatly assisted by Iran, especially if rising oil prices and the potential lifting of economic sanctions as part of a new nuclear deal replenish Tehranâs coffers and its appetite for regional adventures. Jordan, too, would be at risk if a radical Palestinian state turns its sights on a fractious Hashemite regime.
And what about peace? A Hamas government would likely renege on any agreement with a Jewish state that does not honor the âright of returnâ of the descendants of Palestinian refugees. Anti-Zionist groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace would make the Palestinian case in the United States while the Tucker Carlson wing of the Republican Party would call for sharp restrictions on immigration.
As for Israelis, they would eventually emerge from the morass, at a terrible cost in blood, because they have no other choice. When they did, they could be sure the progressive wing of the Democratic Party would be quick to denounce them for having the temerity to survive.
- ORGANIZE YOUR EMAIL, get rid of spam, and EARN MONEY while you make life easier with the worldsâ largest (FREE) viral email program â check out: http://vib.cm/burtkauf
TOP ADVERTISING CHOICES - Internet - Email Marketing , Website Development, Text Marketing
In its 2010 study, we learned that Internet Marketing has replaced the old, traditional print (newspaper and phone book ) along with broadcast TV and radio , as the top ad media of choice by business and consumer alike - and more cost-effective (Ad-ology), with direct mail a close second. . Now , within the top-ranked INTERNET, Ad-ology has broken down the internet by category, showing email marketing still leads the way, along with website development (SEO) and mobile marketing coming on strong. Coupon Country and YellowPagesCoupons.net feature these top marketing platforms at unbelievably low rates 1-888-422-6876.
According to Ad-ologyâs survey, the top places where small businesses will put their marketing dollars in 2011 are e-mail marketing (72.7 percent in 2011 vs. 56.6 percent in 2010) and company website development (70.5 percent in 2011 vs. 57.7 percent in 2010). CouponCountry does it all⊠or call 1-888-422-6876